{"id":"W2137691917","doi":"10.1109/jlt.2007.899171","title":"Efficient Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Exploiting the FD-BPM","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Lightwave Technology","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Beam propagation method; Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Finite difference method; Finite difference; Variable (mathematics); Adjoint equation; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Partial differential equation; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01422651,0.0001527799,0.0005568564,0.001902479,0.0001783364,0.00006425064,0.0006842493,0.0001916932,0.00005760449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005793745,0.00007896979,0.0003724384,0.003819434,0.0002563946,0.00005505823,0.0001649739,0.0005807952,0.00004432928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001026752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006982124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003673529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001882174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969678,0.0001407449,0.001226497,0.0002478932,0.001040784,0.0003763128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951025,0.002552322,0.0008675602,0.000598504,0.000776422,0.0001027272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002763924,0.0007168175,0.02382494,0.00001616402,0.002262859,0.003509891,0.002320174,0.6395313,0.05811581,0.1273098,0.005993898,0.1361219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003652404,0.002391964,0.1900365,0.0003369869,0.004134709,0.01174829,0.02574873,0.386963,0.1208494,0.1819056,0.06984363,0.00238879],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4201706,0.0002246967,0.5756878,0.003112076,0.0002635707,0.00005524002,0.000001109496,0.00004127985,0.000443565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846734,0.000006010564,0.01494345,0.00008168189,0.0001611307,6.989968e-7,1.117831e-7,0.000008376177,0.0001251243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5645028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6936073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05267290627197443,"score_gpt":0.3310756681460348,"score_spread":0.2784027618740604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}