{"id":"W2137740059","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2009.5090203","title":"A comprehensive simulation study of SWAN QoS model in MANETs with proactive and reactive routing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Mobile Ad Hoc Networks","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computer network; Quality of service; Mobile ad hoc network; Throughput; Routing (electronic design automation); Adaptive quality of service multi-hop routing; Routing protocol; Wireless ad hoc network; Optimized Link State Routing Protocol; Distributed computing; Wireless; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007093046,0.0004575889,0.0004867465,0.0004054772,0.0004849707,0.0004657742,0.0005338786,0.0005684253,0.0007679822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00185967,0.0001853618,0.0003571825,0.0005027484,0.0003611004,0.0009071261,0.0003597478,0.0004869498,0.000111891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007127917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005360372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005818117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004810059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999702,0.0001263384,0.00001129716,0.00003248634,0.00008693623,0.00004087935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991826,0.0005407663,0.00007206175,0.00006538066,0.0001037971,0.00003542276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002277558,0.000031019,0.0007740495,0.00001910286,0.00001139561,0.0000471329,0.00002359727,0.9936349,0.0008921838,0.002530341,0.0001538018,0.00185959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003619486,0.0000374897,0.0001677084,0.000002551479,0.000004701852,0.00002009699,0.00001941464,0.998426,0.0003493433,0.000668513,0.000296893,0.000003598786],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.811236,0.0006651606,0.1676681,0.0005509342,0.0001162028,0.00015427,0.0004159762,0.0003335781,0.0188598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840709,0.0003964376,0.01311144,0.0000660085,0.00001734879,0.00007074395,0.0001618706,0.00002724952,0.002077993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005818117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01156855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02385254251161542,"score_gpt":0.270103044627469,"score_spread":0.2462505021158536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}