{"id":"W2137744274","doi":"10.1139/f01-029","title":"A general framework for integrating the standardization of catch per unit of effort into stock assessment models","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Stock assessment; Catch per unit effort; Stock (firearms); Categorical variable; Econometrics; Point estimation; Statistics; Confidence interval; Standardization; Computer science; Mathematics; Fishery; Fishing; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03970727,0.002980331,0.002498886,0.004394397,0.001437829,0.004870481,0.006398044,0.002943471,0.004133707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0666898,0.001880863,0.004987702,0.00514982,0.003704047,0.006668713,0.004933086,0.005912975,0.001423472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00474551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007451716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01549417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01032127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9797545,0.01078233,0.00167589,0.002077409,0.005087506,0.0006223399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776319,0.01315397,0.00182401,0.002372584,0.004521401,0.0004961366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001675689,0.00005922749,0.001154386,0.0002087838,0.0002514085,0.000149964,0.0003967991,0.1965467,0.0004103627,0.7487637,0.002651254,0.04939062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002259033,0.00006193213,0.0005294869,0.0001980798,0.00008232796,0.0001262812,0.00005966728,0.254835,0.0003293134,0.7301824,0.0134906,0.00008233754],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003647202,0.0001463638,0.9983916,0.0001736576,0.00002883218,0.00004465777,0.00004937124,0.00008359559,0.0007172753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04869265,0.0009027875,0.9470229,0.0002669172,0.0002742688,0.0008322192,0.0002897461,0.000157551,0.001560966],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03970727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2099946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03734013871083914,"score_gpt":0.3001780558953752,"score_spread":0.262837917184536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}