{"id":"W2137779754","doi":"10.1093/heapro/17.1.61","title":"Influence of health promotion bureaucracy on community participation: a Canadian case study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Promotion International","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Bureaucracy; Health promotion; Promotion (chess); Citizen journalism; Political science; Public relations; Participatory action research; Community participation; Public administration; Economic growth; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Health care; Politics; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005187269,0.000237243,0.0004541886,0.0006196256,0.003714589,0.00001638005,0.0003775975,0.00013973,0.001530055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000747851,0.0002408112,0.00005257784,0.0004859283,0.00006450868,0.0002731847,0.000126728,0.001632031,0.0003446067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002405282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00232209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4337344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3948733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905537,0.005715132,0.00192101,0.0002921316,0.0006821698,0.0008358349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961368,0.0004994677,0.001091242,0.0006775176,0.0007975837,0.0007973484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001133581,0.02013786,0.4931552,0.002399167,0.0001652771,0.0001688477,0.3440386,0.001211978,0.00000427081,0.005638475,0.02472517,0.1082417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005783151,0.01010473,0.9115382,0.00227515,0.00001691558,0.0002667069,0.04320583,0.003834373,0.000005013656,0.001288506,0.02107419,0.0006071673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441202,0.00003718275,0.0001322815,0.04816461,0.0007559928,0.003810021,0.0000797539,0.0001107413,0.002789233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926544,0.0000659379,0.000222919,0.005314535,0.0001293067,0.000772598,0.0001426928,0.00002707309,0.0006705474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.418383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3288539141267976,"score_gpt":0.5234145619611003,"score_spread":0.1945606478343027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}