{"id":"W2137799651","doi":"10.1139/f08-166","title":"A practical framework for selecting among single-species, community-, and ecosystem-based recovery plans","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Ecosystem; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental resource management; Plan (archaeology); Taxon; Geography; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03013384,0.001849525,0.001745636,0.007497487,0.003235406,0.006495093,0.004024018,0.003074272,0.008860385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05253967,0.0008330188,0.00170263,0.004169642,0.004271286,0.005368381,0.005050455,0.003471435,0.001116634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007020826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01522275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02213575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0444815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849452,0.008380871,0.001269637,0.001669999,0.002847964,0.000886279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765188,0.01304936,0.003169367,0.001175779,0.004711322,0.001375329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001462507,0.000593735,0.01590885,0.0006074175,0.0002009828,0.0006749319,0.002281471,0.3469314,0.001677297,0.3715009,0.02002832,0.2394485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002078014,0.0004695619,0.006387461,0.0005943917,0.0001649474,0.0005757043,0.003007705,0.5639464,0.001066192,0.3880646,0.0352473,0.0002680017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009536292,0.0002297523,0.975432,0.003081219,0.00004667123,0.001095562,0.0003124932,0.000391587,0.00987453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07416943,0.0001544031,0.9235639,0.0002352107,0.00003433437,0.0007879367,0.0002453953,0.00005172656,0.0007577296],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03013384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1593648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0546631444584525,"score_gpt":0.2396888066218361,"score_spread":0.1850256621633836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}