{"id":"W2137853422","doi":"10.1017/s027226311200071x","title":"COUNTERPOINT PIECE: THE CASE FOR VARIETY IN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corrective feedback; Counterpoint; Variety (cybernetics); Representation (politics); Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Pedagogy; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001736464,0.0001172682,0.0001815371,0.0001415397,0.0006236614,0.000151275,0.0001145846,0.00004087434,0.004148798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002929776,0.00008117648,0.0000473865,0.000081018,0.0003694922,0.0002334822,0.00008843504,0.0004873451,0.00008041513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001767661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001572216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003295888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01890027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987466,0.0003361952,0.000229665,0.0002300808,0.0001258946,0.0003315185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984416,0.001073761,0.0000570827,0.0001855668,0.0002213324,0.00002066982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003908512,0.00006424475,0.0001437276,0.0001062719,0.00004813364,0.0001548081,0.9557781,0.00001828019,0.00006346482,0.01018566,0.02787406,0.005524214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005869602,0.0001484102,0.0007807951,0.0001354358,0.000007053466,0.00005003026,0.9853255,0.0005506758,0.00003521579,0.003229673,0.009010664,0.0001395578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683756,0.00327849,0.00001813407,0.0005629843,0.0005420817,0.0006730516,0.00002707062,0.00003438695,0.02648823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948072,0.00002317457,0.00004186593,0.0006879354,0.0005340489,0.000389102,0.00001601629,0.00001658529,0.003484047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02954748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08911202397848735,"score_gpt":0.3835218359167329,"score_spread":0.2944098119382456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}