{"id":"W2137977039","doi":"10.2193/2008-036","title":"A Double‐Observer Method to Estimate Detection Rate During Aerial Waterfowl Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Anas; Crew; Observer (physics); Waterfowl; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Cartography; Physics; Habitat; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02232146,0.0008448103,0.001012725,0.001841172,0.0004713419,0.0008102503,0.00151333,0.0007066992,0.001534044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05634261,0.0006401333,0.0009565924,0.0007561705,0.0005681338,0.001133129,0.001215493,0.0007036019,0.0005514415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006904862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005552528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003468231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004152604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828337,0.009992754,0.001313014,0.003260713,0.002265126,0.0003346773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9266878,0.04052506,0.01301817,0.009576041,0.009674295,0.0005186429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001901785,0.0003929184,0.6440871,0.0006403653,0.001472918,0.0001873836,0.002113151,0.018604,0.02561197,0.002720663,0.001823056,0.3004447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002368157,0.002875796,0.4510912,0.0002423077,0.0008710388,0.001093281,0.000720544,0.4952909,0.03394059,0.003661022,0.009550865,0.0004256962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.325499,0.0003982426,0.66892,0.00005226482,0.0001327439,0.001020007,0.0006939605,0.0009152721,0.002368522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7395931,0.0001504207,0.2561819,0.00007545002,0.00004750207,0.001485716,0.0007898432,0.0001493164,0.001526781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02232146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1180486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02170526726843731,"score_gpt":0.2686347106683022,"score_spread":0.2469294433998649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}