{"id":"W2137977039","doi":"10.2193/2008-036","title":"A Double‐Observer Method to Estimate Detection Rate During Aerial Waterfowl Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Anas; Crew; Observer (physics); Waterfowl; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Cartography; Physics; Habitat; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310764,0.0001557469,0.0002275089,0.000125887,0.0002796083,0.00002972168,0.000266419,0.00006237483,0.000402375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002409166,0.000136136,0.0001003016,0.0002992708,0.00004513398,0.0004198965,0.0002274827,0.000160373,0.0003157202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002344886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009182804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000926883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001037221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982792,0.0003785749,0.0005032527,0.0002194513,0.0003310354,0.000288504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.00003700923,0.0002837989,0.0001821585,0.00002754181,0.0001497531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001999584,0.0004364447,0.8238968,0.00007315842,0.000404906,0.001021728,0.001109317,0.124916,0.01120986,0.00006742629,0.01723454,0.01763021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001658318,0.0001679758,0.9857965,0.00001964289,0.00005136793,0.0001466615,0.00002665019,0.0003294524,0.002920537,0.0001009341,0.008619815,0.0001621256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505542,0.0000036556,0.04597818,0.001769212,0.0006308896,0.0002431523,5.61129e-7,0.0000228301,0.0007973452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797754,0.00002129124,0.01600458,0.001384805,0.0002254265,0.00001769779,0.000001082741,0.0000185221,0.002551187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1618997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5551463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02170526726843731,"score_gpt":0.2686347106683022,"score_spread":0.2469294433998649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}