{"id":"W2137978945","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.2004.1398450","title":"Integrating uncertain preferences into status quo analysis: an environmental conflict case study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Preference; Status quo bias; Flexibility (engineering); Conflict analysis; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Management science; Graph; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Theoretical computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002948303,0.0005867681,0.000647597,0.0007885334,0.001305954,0.001278435,0.0009765439,0.001631737,0.001807828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004627631,0.0003026795,0.0006724425,0.001361619,0.001094513,0.001946186,0.001433289,0.0009805365,0.0001445479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001091555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008918815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003210491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003448664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979686,0.001426837,0.00005546553,0.0001056326,0.000301866,0.0001416382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971764,0.002249574,0.0001234854,0.0001227332,0.0002270793,0.0001007371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003526561,0.0003372808,0.004690257,0.0001548559,0.00008001721,0.002065685,0.001080207,0.6726633,0.003257179,0.203143,0.002337462,0.1098381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005019525,0.0000875941,0.0004360293,0.00001833811,0.00002703055,0.0003074064,0.0005125111,0.9415131,0.002929747,0.0499008,0.004187662,0.00002953676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2209749,0.0001619563,0.76245,0.00125744,0.00004285489,0.0002664821,0.0001028086,0.0001235946,0.01462003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.735179,0.0001176948,0.263048,0.00006020871,0.00001195821,0.0001104212,0.00005483796,0.00002216043,0.001395743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003210491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01559228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1446160223067011,"score_gpt":0.4372196328788903,"score_spread":0.2926036105721891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}