{"id":"W2138153404","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011","title":"The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Covariate; Statistics; Confounding; Relative risk; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Medicine; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03216964,0.0001743249,0.002367225,0.00005111836,0.0001886892,0.000002344528,0.0004246628,0.0002714912,0.000006688254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2958995,0.0000884677,0.0005987726,0.00007370536,0.0007461387,0.0001573334,0.0001100371,0.001142446,7.551884e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003678644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001238801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002066084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001481912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898684,0.004330405,0.005148938,0.0001837743,0.0001399481,0.0003285227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8111851,0.1816926,0.006075667,0.0003107215,0.0006205956,0.0001152955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018542,0.0005583025,0.4242275,0.0003254178,0.0006406676,0.00001177226,0.0004191073,0.0005040511,0.0004136163,0.2584674,0.003802395,0.3087755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006322385,0.002914534,0.05012852,0.0002705686,0.0001103457,0.0001583702,0.00001823148,0.02617668,0.001431771,0.9174725,0.0005556011,0.000130641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4135584,0.0001084465,0.5850109,0.000658271,0.0003420793,0.0002237973,9.39437e-7,0.00001449831,0.00008265839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2533274,0.0006645647,0.7455072,0.0001454149,0.0002638685,0.00001287084,3.27234e-7,0.00001468778,0.00006363025],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.659005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8314351686646472,"score_gpt":0.6606402731520815,"score_spread":0.1707948955125657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}