{"id":"W2138172344","doi":"10.1002/etc.398","title":"Effluent-dominated streams. Part 2: Presence and possible effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Wascana Creek, Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products; Effluent; Environmental science; Sewage; Sewage treatment; Aquatic ecosystem; Triclosan; Environmental chemistry; Environmental engineering; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003251682,0.0006554364,0.0004137411,0.002708052,0.003233097,0.00199652,0.001148714,0.0005095847,0.003884012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006052736,0.0003591825,0.0005611371,0.00696187,0.0007350421,0.000415934,0.0008630891,0.0005225778,0.0005901676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02529803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03551126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999148,0.00005390923,0.00005547016,0.000195728,0.0003330245,0.0002137712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984749,0.00007169748,0.0001499064,0.00002388864,0.001055168,0.0002244694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001680878,0.0001947824,0.9712204,0.0001660026,0.0001229786,0.0009399157,0.00135612,0.000425651,0.005180431,0.00009840847,0.002775122,0.01735226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001135765,0.00006058026,0.9909515,0.00002790733,0.00003649228,0.00010213,0.003927689,0.0003916537,0.0006506557,0.00003893417,0.003778803,0.00002227903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801996,0.0007907496,0.0002652542,0.0002951706,0.00002732673,0.0003385565,0.01186633,0.00004022423,0.006176751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758808,0.00121301,0.001271924,0.0003846597,0.00001105203,0.0001864574,0.009518005,0.00001989588,0.01151417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02529803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1835509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004580988522416379,"score_gpt":0.2209404081741236,"score_spread":0.2163594196517072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}