{"id":"W2138243418","doi":"10.2172/962421","title":"Kootenai River Resident Fish Assessment, FY2008 KTOI Progress Report.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Environmental science; Drainage basin; Productivity; Environmental resource management; Geography; Fishery; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006041451,0.0005586075,0.0001736805,0.001712104,0.0008121034,0.0007482661,0.0006972941,0.0002401093,0.01231222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004934102,0.000273609,0.0002109903,0.001673156,0.00009513917,0.0005463022,0.0008128572,0.000292586,0.00478544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002724038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004786669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5039138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7627922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997362,0.00001239879,0.00002654074,0.00004190012,0.0001366081,0.00004629056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994893,0.000008418858,0.0000447552,0.00001798723,0.0003774814,0.00006199208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009043097,0.0004000023,0.4027989,0.0006452774,0.000119972,0.0003275264,0.001153634,0.00104368,0.002882399,0.0007381281,0.4624662,0.12652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004838574,0.0001219901,0.7291155,0.0001043235,0.00006384482,0.00008863654,0.002091209,0.0008373325,0.00161777,0.0001279508,0.2657575,0.00002548665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1612297,0.0008560916,0.001330253,0.0008428401,0.0002681941,0.0008036145,0.6962665,0.0004282175,0.1379745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1447915,0.0009875819,0.004766616,0.0002820401,0.0000379139,0.00111982,0.6195787,0.0001382386,0.2282976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5039138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01992028706654337,"score_gpt":0.301426845777404,"score_spread":0.2815065587108606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}