{"id":"W2138275210","doi":"10.1016/s0263-8223(03)00187-9","title":"Numerical simulation of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic composite armours","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Projectile; Oblique case; Ceramic; Penetration (warfare); Finite element method; Kinetic energy; Materials science; Composite number; Ballistic impact; Impact; Structural engineering; Composite material; Engineering; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002507876,0.0004749389,0.000731473,0.0007264301,0.001033261,0.0008145187,0.0009549654,0.001356491,0.004742476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001086536,0.0004782225,0.0004926153,0.0006359221,0.001080708,0.0004124073,0.0006399747,0.0006063372,0.0002842056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008704305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01493069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009949402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998268,0.00001858849,0.000004624717,0.00001751858,0.00006585161,0.00006658897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994862,0.0002484355,0.00006874367,0.00003535902,0.00008491099,0.00007622435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001668979,0.00007047587,0.00108421,0.00003774396,0.00001551925,0.0001856902,0.00007166829,0.9882985,0.006519666,0.001844193,0.0001650782,0.001540293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001484078,0.00005134951,0.0006709853,0.000003189667,0.000004179712,0.0000180477,0.00004234657,0.9975206,0.001311922,0.0001984794,0.0001563777,0.000007610561],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731751,0.00008394125,0.008314411,0.0001134211,0.00004502274,0.00004069793,0.0001434146,0.0001295858,0.01795444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964307,0.00003103706,0.00153063,0.00001307418,0.000003087514,0.00001289637,0.00003859929,0.00001622931,0.001923701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01493069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02968758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01380803002633395,"score_gpt":0.3021366153268446,"score_spread":0.2883285853005106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}