{"id":"W2138275210","doi":"10.1016/s0263-8223(03)00187-9","title":"Numerical simulation of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic composite armours","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Projectile; Oblique case; Ceramic; Penetration (warfare); Finite element method; Kinetic energy; Materials science; Composite number; Ballistic impact; Impact; Structural engineering; Composite material; Engineering; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001225512,0.0002465242,0.0003528392,0.0001012386,0.0001419451,0.0001208056,0.0001548067,0.0001068835,0.0004126778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003975115,0.0001905069,0.00007237271,0.000113512,0.0001331483,0.0001406652,0.00003218869,0.0001147699,0.00001847932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005844785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004370355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001538264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001926697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987329,0.0001622633,0.0002998727,0.0002548661,0.0002417942,0.0003083052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.0001364121,0.0001523031,0.0002274962,0.00007209613,0.0001635324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002249846,0.00003725576,0.005004751,0.00003254245,0.000009689485,0.0000057517,0.0002091891,0.03398077,0.9589742,0.001375959,0.00002014494,0.0001247974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006183548,0.0003469934,0.3863405,0.00003261615,0.00004858782,0.0000374382,0.000008344769,0.001131565,0.6099982,0.001099602,0.00005694731,0.000280852],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976664,0.00004632074,0.001279954,0.00002031603,0.0003729694,0.0002006853,0.00009099927,0.0000571967,0.0002651779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986616,0.000003262284,0.001155965,0.00006478484,0.00005215,0.000002621747,0.00002604262,0.00002037097,0.00001318603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3813357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7768646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01380803002633395,"score_gpt":0.3021366153268446,"score_spread":0.2883285853005106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}