{"id":"W2138377694","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.0020244","title":"Human Dignity as a Criterion for Science Policy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Medicine","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Alberta","funders":"Stem Cell Network; American Association for the Advancement of Science","keywords":"Dignity; Science policy; Medicine; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1310993,0.0008751846,0.002583177,0.00403923,0.01107412,0.02140203,0.005166574,0.04562247,0.0052808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2194564,0.001004497,0.001830684,0.00227813,0.08505434,0.02880329,0.01443655,0.04005333,0.001252008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01629642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02972952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009850778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8992063,0.05842528,0.00850206,0.007024757,0.02152753,0.00531412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8156659,0.1411595,0.008980396,0.0103266,0.01639122,0.007476348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002940539,0.00002327396,0.0003149818,0.0001112643,0.00001487733,0.00007198377,0.001227975,0.0002531904,0.000085992,0.9811029,0.01302866,0.003735402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000308371,0.00002714675,0.0002839952,0.0003846121,0.00001453507,0.00006988666,0.0008828585,0.0004558724,0.0001879953,0.9677963,0.02982199,0.00004394416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006136975,0.008122015,0.02627093,0.8588779,0.003241266,0.0001557169,0.0001229238,0.0000820508,0.09699032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5890883,0.005037261,0.0536957,0.3342476,0.00590053,0.0008571448,0.0001263757,0.0001514361,0.01089575],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1310993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6933277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1176986079233268,"score_gpt":0.4208812627109907,"score_spread":0.3031826547876639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}