{"id":"W2138381158","doi":"10.1190/geo2012-0225.1","title":"Mitigating remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data using the normalized source strength","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Remanence; Magnetization; Stoner–Wohlfarth model; Magnetic anomaly; Geology; Rock magnetism; Magnetic field; Natural remanent magnetization; Potential field; Field (mathematics); Geophysics; Mineralogy; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001480637,0.0006824034,0.0004776747,0.001836187,0.0003368487,0.0009904073,0.0007844312,0.0004757006,0.001213327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00655335,0.0003330802,0.0004170421,0.0009410232,0.0005538526,0.001501305,0.0009218485,0.0007331874,0.0003988593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009822133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002263792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006583871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999613,0.0001119208,0.00003625388,0.00005599571,0.0001532014,0.00002960553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784,0.0008421864,0.0002630227,0.0003059091,0.0007005488,0.00004832652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000355884,0.0001235793,0.01981743,0.0006035399,0.0002644384,0.0004910073,0.0007060519,0.1090107,0.3472057,0.00945063,0.002309184,0.5096618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004502559,0.00009663167,0.01444639,0.00005994815,0.00008601676,0.0005335732,0.0003245019,0.7632686,0.1967272,0.01374912,0.01054095,0.0001219239],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.09860278,0.00027835,0.8973942,0.000301644,0.00006837497,0.0000446226,0.0003869115,0.001827027,0.001096103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3414569,0.0002382586,0.6564528,0.00006846349,0.00004676937,0.00004989453,0.0005991065,0.0004094134,0.0006784064],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002263792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007830441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01851302237884141,"score_gpt":0.2363204075934295,"score_spread":0.2178073852145881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}