{"id":"W2138407064","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2006.00194.x","title":"<scp>Killing the Law of Large Numbers: Mortality Risk Premiums and the Sharpe Ratio</scp>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharpe ratio; Stylized fact; Economics; Portfolio; Hazard ratio; Stock (firearms); Econometrics; Systematic risk; Risk premium; Capital asset pricing model; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009383893,0.0002320988,0.0005353768,0.00007368006,0.001334557,0.0002159272,0.0008269926,0.0001209115,0.0000144369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007906814,0.0001392264,0.0004236307,0.0006307241,0.001554439,0.0005958086,0.00008846352,0.0007199632,0.000004506938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006630398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008464421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01674152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01468857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954312,0.001448195,0.001081678,0.0002552648,0.001294314,0.0004892878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953153,0.001303032,0.002307113,0.0004613003,0.0005192017,0.00009408184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004989253,0.0001722742,0.8957759,0.00003166391,0.0002552836,0.00001255306,0.009660324,0.001196978,0.000009562854,0.08871599,0.003381584,0.0007380459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001794794,0.00003770837,0.9167817,0.00008915114,0.0002750751,0.000007196791,0.005340177,0.0003699408,0.00008159477,0.03027482,0.04483946,0.0001083815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767601,0.005003995,0.001264793,0.000376585,0.001068697,0.0005007493,0.0001363009,0.00002589642,0.01486287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900762,0.007968304,0.0005156369,0.0001836587,0.001100134,0.00001096567,0.000001476079,0.00001927702,0.0001243137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05844118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009229328043893752,"score_gpt":0.2730810355334207,"score_spread":0.263851707489527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}