{"id":"W2138407064","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2006.00194.x","title":"<scp>Killing the Law of Large Numbers: Mortality Risk Premiums and the Sharpe Ratio</scp>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharpe ratio; Stylized fact; Economics; Portfolio; Hazard ratio; Stock (firearms); Econometrics; Systematic risk; Risk premium; Capital asset pricing model; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002743526,0.0004543239,0.0004352705,0.001218552,0.0003992222,0.002704971,0.0005553333,0.001588904,0.002800746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01197611,0.0002532264,0.0005939258,0.0007805898,0.003163071,0.003716221,0.0009108598,0.002087878,0.000330245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001110328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003810149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001167629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004848126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993706,0.0002516208,0.00003216185,0.00008320609,0.0001953279,0.00006706852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954722,0.002866959,0.0007273117,0.0002693504,0.0004793967,0.0001847421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001631457,0.00002085536,0.0009509602,0.00004930085,0.00001862996,0.0001987444,0.0001085038,0.009090345,0.001106739,0.9759272,0.00244603,0.01006637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005355096,0.00002329706,0.001691424,0.00003614457,0.00001278946,0.0002400897,0.00004249256,0.04914833,0.0005216449,0.9447315,0.003526359,0.00002056492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2250138,0.03166014,0.5913377,0.02448351,0.001081507,0.00006334212,0.0002059448,0.0004223456,0.1257318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975087,0.004451111,0.01281529,0.0008932055,0.001408944,0.00002502067,0.00003645107,0.00005303741,0.005229929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002800746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01450932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009229328043893752,"score_gpt":0.2730810355334207,"score_spread":0.263851707489527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}