{"id":"W2138467141","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.053","title":"Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Versus Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Ejection fraction; Catheter ablation; Cardiology; Atrial fibrillation; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Ablation; Heart failure; Randomized controlled trial; Relative risk; Catheter; Observational study; Ventricular tachycardia; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006842255,0.002166004,0.01455192,0.001790752,0.0003948323,0.001727701,0.001505913,0.001611947,0.00278552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01874008,0.001110395,0.02970242,0.002268347,0.0004376524,0.001035658,0.0008968274,0.002280977,0.0002316612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001101239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003612438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006394859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955807,0.00232877,0.001038011,0.0005229987,0.0003741302,0.0001554067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894825,0.008415951,0.001165757,0.0003852295,0.000407973,0.0001425961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01481201,0.00004292178,0.003159855,0.05285398,0.9166704,0.0001086173,0.00003599004,0.0005651803,0.0003090156,0.00008396643,0.0003760549,0.01098198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002671356,0.0004748597,0.002987215,0.001584938,0.9910165,0.00007780653,0.0000172276,0.000201778,0.0001212366,0.000146245,0.0006836767,0.00001714137],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03396851,0.9627069,0.00130564,0.000235377,0.0005192028,0.0001791289,0.0005461116,0.00005523943,0.0004839145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.532906,0.4605317,0.002945603,0.0009611385,0.0006749774,0.0003743218,0.0009075376,0.00004968068,0.0006490662],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01455192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03618574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05016557200953411,"score_gpt":0.3288211824434173,"score_spread":0.2786556104338832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}