{"id":"W2138544015","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00003-3","title":"Quantifying the Biodiversity Value of Repeatedly Logged Rainforests","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Logging; Biodiversity; Species richness; Rainforest; Geography; Biota; Abundance (ecology); Guild; Habitat; Forest restoration; Forest ecology; Biology; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01527173,0.0008097472,0.001846933,0.000490683,0.00174611,0.0001064825,0.003701284,0.002405087,0.005075982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01499042,0.0003191875,0.0004365814,0.001547118,0.01092678,0.0008101149,0.003825709,0.007591342,0.0009613557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008874603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001678047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002647309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03788227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876714,0.003144234,0.0017781,0.002143065,0.001967517,0.003295623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621308,0.03528942,0.0005071191,0.0005490935,0.001162785,0.0003607651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002861053,0.00294314,0.3806456,0.0004538984,0.0002272168,0.001588684,0.0003441998,0.0009244502,0.001169568,0.3181501,0.007575196,0.2831169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000849755,0.005065752,0.3848314,0.0003082687,0.00001625418,0.00001926152,0.001236631,0.0001144566,0.00009495828,0.2208271,0.385779,0.0008571597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5638433,0.04198591,0.000001622127,0.006240083,0.0008629412,0.004969865,0.0002266294,0.0001466282,0.381723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8108401,0.1690249,0.00018535,0.0003953352,0.0002907008,0.0006826222,0.0001210207,0.000009373916,0.01845055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3782038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.174599500188641,"score_gpt":0.3995638537443142,"score_spread":0.2249643535556733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}