{"id":"W2138725277","doi":"10.1080/08982110701241293","title":"Probability Constrained Optimization as a Tool for Functional Design for Six Sigma","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Engineering","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Six Sigma; Reliability engineering; Probabilistic design; Mathematical optimization; Design of experiments; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering design process; Manufacturing engineering; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01916228,0.000201754,0.0003362038,0.0001669356,0.0001370229,0.0001573204,0.0002766003,0.0001349187,0.000165147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02125201,0.0001855014,0.0002096447,0.0004189541,0.00006456667,0.000346819,0.00003988391,0.00008864493,0.00001080705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001608658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001057417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005799678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.23141e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971839,0.0001737002,0.0009779769,0.0005626589,0.0006970627,0.0004046778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877397,0.01110239,0.0001790078,0.0003875913,0.0004584896,0.0001328324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005093364,0.000074274,0.00009301143,0.000034328,0.00002174328,5.096748e-7,0.0001743098,0.9285816,0.0369072,0.02664303,0.0002337302,0.006726912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001486201,0.0003910676,0.001116208,0.00001657318,0.0000170132,0.00000845777,0.0002806663,0.9155822,0.06316362,0.01519236,0.00227826,0.0004673139],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01416646,0.00003241512,0.9830229,0.0001249475,0.0005434609,0.001682778,0.00003160736,0.0001493811,0.000245998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.203056,2.854475e-7,0.7962627,0.00008643164,0.0001369294,0.0001990645,0.00001476775,0.0000220649,0.0002217801],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1888895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3031025173730075,"score_gpt":0.4538811530733404,"score_spread":0.1507786357003329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}