{"id":"W2138777155","doi":"10.1002/eco.1390","title":"Novel ways to assess forested wetland restoration in North Carolina using ecohydrological patterns from reference sites","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecohydrology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Wetland; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Water table; Edaphic; Table (database); Plant community; Ecology; Soil water; Species richness; Groundwater; Geology; Database; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007669806,0.000260271,0.0002409089,0.002323179,0.0006489172,0.0008681924,0.0006050792,0.0002040867,0.0007516315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00197197,0.0001296532,0.0001773911,0.002121055,0.0003315971,0.000447863,0.0006386446,0.0002317801,0.0001403514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001085736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001432365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1974801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4486728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995746,0.00008371939,0.00003021767,0.00009982273,0.0001542234,0.00005744459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981609,0.0002294171,0.0004613864,0.0001409048,0.0008510403,0.0001562726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008110538,0.0001179029,0.9531093,0.00005521594,0.00006416287,0.0001458491,0.001414286,0.002229328,0.007261941,0.0001631431,0.0008657054,0.03449203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003637993,0.00003545187,0.9932462,0.00001376567,0.00001388491,0.00002772639,0.001118479,0.003511673,0.0009978584,0.00006036113,0.0009558775,0.00001503918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938415,0.00008254413,0.002858907,0.00003459773,0.000004180961,0.00006413412,0.0005406741,0.0000945728,0.00247896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918219,0.00004184405,0.006948614,0.0000174738,0.000002999984,0.00007345373,0.0007005527,0.00001231278,0.000380886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1974801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3926612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06376222607328168,"score_gpt":0.2606184591497072,"score_spread":0.1968562330764255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}