{"id":"W2138777155","doi":"10.1002/eco.1390","title":"Novel ways to assess forested wetland restoration in North Carolina using ecohydrological patterns from reference sites","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecohydrology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Wetland; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Water table; Edaphic; Table (database); Plant community; Ecology; Soil water; Species richness; Groundwater; Geology; Database; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000160678,0.0002246777,0.0003508397,0.0001276716,0.00011427,0.00003132215,0.0003452155,0.0002809716,0.002094149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005349515,0.0001951824,0.00003864697,0.0002525513,0.00008616094,0.0002463539,0.000309254,0.0002512724,0.0007564657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002326446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001402417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01416421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1118002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981728,0.00008662546,0.0003822256,0.000620571,0.0001532789,0.0005845547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992087,0.0001460198,0.0001147454,0.0003285878,0.00001344613,0.0001884537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003621321,0.00008144186,0.9338945,0.000002145111,0.000007187817,0.00002679041,0.0001323117,0.02571078,0.03976798,0.00004174874,0.0001362815,0.0001626415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005895077,0.0002194886,0.9015081,0.000003201061,0.000009976217,0.00001687167,0.000004070684,0.0964287,0.0002236654,0.0004845301,0.0002987986,0.0002130744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945635,0.000004884307,0.003539806,0.000327457,0.000139584,0.0003516739,0.00005051944,0.00005779887,0.000964749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962905,0.000004826692,0.002577249,0.0006601175,0.00009623692,0.00008110024,0.0002604075,0.00001641799,0.00001313396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09763603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06376222607328168,"score_gpt":0.2606184591497072,"score_spread":0.1968562330764255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}