{"id":"W2138815916","doi":"10.1897/08-376.1","title":"A review of potential methods of determining critical effect size for designing environmental monitoring programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); A priori and a posteriori; Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Identification (biology); Stakeholder; Statistical power; Multivariate statistics; Warning system; Statistics; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Data mining; Ecology; Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01488997,0.002766573,0.004513354,0.009967775,0.0007041214,0.001849497,0.004375909,0.002747237,0.007267255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02872878,0.001206436,0.002601122,0.008361276,0.002145208,0.00325347,0.0009325987,0.002510794,0.004006832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002962626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003745342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003634771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006336327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917812,0.003501936,0.001221587,0.0009159411,0.00247684,0.0001025974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664434,0.02828487,0.001750221,0.0005819118,0.002726726,0.000212798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219081,0.0001075529,0.000330319,0.04678578,0.000287054,0.0001288972,0.0001183972,0.001364582,0.0007320667,0.01179059,0.01447214,0.9238104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001075071,0.0005030395,0.004020928,0.04507042,0.001214076,0.001722364,0.0002065925,0.001155584,0.002000422,0.02546492,0.9183468,0.0001873173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001683445,0.9819,0.01268723,0.0006164178,0.0003802638,0.0001907895,0.0001632765,0.00008049742,0.003813222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001715156,0.9684837,0.02727356,0.0004662365,0.0002215078,0.0005319268,0.0001229906,0.00002818571,0.001156807],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01488997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07874662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0274902077066942,"score_gpt":0.3903117591153925,"score_spread":0.3628215514086983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}