{"id":"W2138815916","doi":"10.1897/08-376.1","title":"A review of potential methods of determining critical effect size for designing environmental monitoring programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); A priori and a posteriori; Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Identification (biology); Stakeholder; Statistical power; Multivariate statistics; Warning system; Statistics; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Data mining; Ecology; Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007996301,0.0007015421,0.002109094,0.00001816821,0.0001849443,0.00001260346,0.000411564,0.0006793312,0.0009484881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001278582,0.00064751,0.0007028091,0.00008081238,0.001246258,0.000111526,0.0004695384,0.0004715503,0.00001065935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004507201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002095953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001873003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.283741e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968098,0.0004127991,0.001082554,0.0007653033,0.0003393832,0.0005901181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997909,0.0007554978,0.0007113765,0.0003698961,0.000001042263,0.0002531634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002454954,0.0004877123,0.0009043521,0.0270598,0.0001494058,0.00001277726,0.00004721994,0.000001017076,0.05154983,2.809787e-7,0.00004321431,0.9197198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006437021,0.01049999,0.005632357,0.201324,0.0224226,0.001747232,0.0009662231,0.00008989216,0.2677638,0.0005903988,0.474354,0.008172587],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009096593,0.9889126,0.0001419613,0.00001222,0.0001327123,0.001328539,0.0001067738,0.00001933911,0.0002492863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007087914,0.9797446,0.01236004,0.00005220197,0.0001145,0.000310304,0.00009808608,0.00006864266,0.000163695],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0274902077066942,"score_gpt":0.3903117591153925,"score_spread":0.3628215514086983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}