{"id":"W2138848243","doi":"10.1109/hicss.2004.1265605","title":"An empirical assessment of transaction risks of IT outsourcing arrangements: an event study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University; Georgia State University","keywords":"Outsourcing; Transaction cost; Business; Asset specificity; Event study; Knowledge process outsourcing; Database transaction; Empirical research; Industrial organization; Asset (computer security); Resource-based view; Risk management; Actuarial science; Finance; Marketing; Computer science; Computer security; Competitive advantage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115375,0.0002326589,0.0003822326,0.0003983091,0.0001321295,0.0001031512,0.0003286675,0.0000575683,0.000372227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013215,0.0002054529,0.0001260824,0.0004222896,0.00003944243,0.001070103,0.00005695658,0.0001406902,0.00001273086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007874965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002551648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003253826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000784763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979299,0.00004800862,0.000662575,0.0004158216,0.000662028,0.0002816895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989507,0.00001734255,0.0003201709,0.0005191675,0.0001640721,0.00002860705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009130305,0.008591871,0.6388779,0.0003519855,0.0002483887,0.00001241767,0.002128674,0.3401784,0.00131929,0.000951918,0.0002562036,0.006991689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008255599,0.001273756,0.7883111,0.0001912013,0.0007911247,0.000001036441,0.07727182,0.1180947,0.0004870375,0.001268496,0.003178709,0.000875455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7470573,0.000004302709,0.247136,0.0009066103,0.000200102,0.0006231337,0.000001767165,0.0001045094,0.003966238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977752,0.000002230584,0.001316461,0.0004991697,0.0002486614,0.00002938074,0.00002445431,0.00003162379,0.00007283867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2507178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8378126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07427762282130802,"score_gpt":0.382940989080799,"score_spread":0.308663366259491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}