{"id":"W2138860708","doi":"10.1109/igarss.2000.857986","title":"Determination of above ground carbon in Canada's forests-a multi-source approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Reforestation; Environmental science; Deforestation (computer science); Carbon sequestration; Afforestation; Vegetation (pathology); Remote sensing; Biomass (ecology); Greenhouse gas; Geospatial analysis; Climate change; Forestry; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Computer science; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833741,0.0006512906,0.0006571637,0.006244412,0.001737689,0.001505582,0.00109872,0.000635233,0.0009494179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008488492,0.0004292189,0.0007028553,0.005864251,0.0003741531,0.000831026,0.0008635832,0.0005700499,0.0001642454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008431296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005549883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8359728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9160031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994585,0.00003383528,0.00002011189,0.0001112719,0.0003150899,0.00006117833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995185,0.00006563822,0.00004084012,0.00003811953,0.0003056837,0.0000312776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004518303,0.0003501304,0.4260242,0.0006690183,0.001114741,0.001205956,0.0007172182,0.1977671,0.05849705,0.008178535,0.003891956,0.3011322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003500182,0.00005387326,0.5726588,0.00009334939,0.0002993053,0.0002177365,0.0008055003,0.4005226,0.013387,0.004839872,0.006949351,0.0001375403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8523347,0.004598632,0.1063219,0.0006551165,0.00005075756,0.0004494834,0.01430533,0.0007345128,0.02054958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138079,0.001331612,0.07804886,0.0001040712,0.00001627502,0.0001115043,0.003585068,0.00007701713,0.002917656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1640272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3299863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01585852133799838,"score_gpt":0.2050221984249846,"score_spread":0.1891636770869862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}