{"id":"W2139024098","doi":"10.1080/13504850500425659","title":"Is South Korea's stock market efficient? A note","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Random walk hypothesis; Unit root; Spurious relationship; Efficient-market hypothesis; Econometrics; Stock market; Economics; Stock (firearms); Random walk; Market efficiency; Financial economics; Unit (ring theory); Unit root test; Mathematics; Statistics; Cointegration; Engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004814462,0.0004113317,0.0006816156,0.0003483344,0.0002002119,0.0001924881,0.0004600291,0.0001845183,0.002321461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008098322,0.0005464322,0.0002843738,0.0001085519,0.0001326288,0.0001289176,0.0001021732,0.0002488133,0.005205915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003184121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001251567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009739246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003106397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971343,0.000008641135,0.001060059,0.0009152639,0.00002341261,0.00085829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984125,0.00006402755,0.0005835027,0.0007717867,0.000003443786,0.0001647104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003982723,0.00039804,0.1023285,0.0001304655,0.0005478725,0.00001216059,0.003014736,0.20769,0.0004743347,0.2703418,0.412248,0.002415773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007785518,0.0001101625,0.3172045,0.00002219227,0.00009260768,0.00004422605,0.0001465618,0.1948115,0.001494847,0.06875697,0.4047829,0.004747937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8529201,0.0001037895,0.001797035,0.002772731,0.0004260878,0.0003596397,0.0005403142,0.00008901492,0.1409913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985614,0.00001710399,0.001354624,0.01064539,0.0006004606,0.00005675195,0.0000630563,0.00008647895,0.001562153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.214876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02481354051884885,"score_gpt":0.1882021271553814,"score_spread":0.1633885866365326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}