{"id":"W2139053550","doi":"10.1007/s00468-006-0119-6","title":"Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trees","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université du Québec; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Canopy; Crown (dentistry); Western Hemlock; Weibull distribution; Basal area; Tree canopy; Environmental science; Diameter at breast height; Tsuga; Remote sensing; Forestry; Geography; Mathematics; Ecology; Statistics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005127525,0.0002948075,0.0002824975,0.0008634893,0.0002902267,0.000395987,0.0004687852,0.0002715592,0.0002381211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001034558,0.0003099337,0.000151918,0.000421772,0.0001632783,0.0004487027,0.0001824584,0.0001754767,0.0001092276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003775362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000387254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01312462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04300559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999058,0.0000171026,0.000005364212,0.00002673966,0.00002703426,0.00001795394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994407,0.0002853785,0.00007060501,0.00004052332,0.0001160253,0.00004660489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005282285,0.0005521285,0.5806712,0.0001284592,0.0001668685,0.0002986866,0.0002886228,0.1177289,0.107887,0.0007164579,0.000705717,0.1903277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003288636,0.0001236696,0.4090059,0.0000129705,0.00008463562,0.0002133114,0.0002072427,0.5790417,0.01038072,0.0005937664,0.000275657,0.00002762572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991432,0.00009514504,0.008161373,0.000008584828,0.000002616774,0.000005065803,0.00007093394,0.0000439305,0.0001804153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892653,0.00004651242,0.01039176,0.000005811794,0.000002255039,0.000003379109,0.0001658872,0.000004854084,0.0001142129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02609646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007132975467006242,"score_gpt":0.2419374413757029,"score_spread":0.2348044659086966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}