{"id":"W2139053550","doi":"10.1007/s00468-006-0119-6","title":"Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trees","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université du Québec; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Canopy; Crown (dentistry); Western Hemlock; Weibull distribution; Basal area; Tree canopy; Environmental science; Diameter at breast height; Tsuga; Remote sensing; Forestry; Geography; Mathematics; Ecology; Statistics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007974254,0.0001029843,0.0001287858,0.00001970736,0.00009748784,0.00001776329,0.0001566342,0.00005744279,0.0003171474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002458656,0.00008349022,0.00003896368,0.000152786,0.0001486494,0.00006520599,0.00005839358,0.00009583517,0.00002537802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005525037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007145463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004453761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01691587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999197,0.0000121472,0.0001934423,0.0001921752,0.0002187966,0.0001864535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994559,0.00007834884,0.00009472575,0.0002914718,0.000006222806,0.00007335118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004715422,0.00004891903,0.6662806,0.000009269022,0.00003221854,0.000007289366,0.003230169,0.008696263,0.2785885,0.0002321328,0.001044004,0.04178342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002939702,0.00004704466,0.9306419,0.00003073986,0.00002692103,0.000002886156,0.0004100248,0.01079972,0.05024788,0.004122918,0.003177061,0.0001988661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826647,0.00002431196,0.01054643,0.00007047852,0.0001298203,0.00008290162,0.00004920684,0.00003709992,0.006395043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965242,9.131931e-7,0.03443195,0.0000219729,0.0001364921,2.072874e-7,0.0000298016,0.00001206008,0.0001246645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007132975467006242,"score_gpt":0.2419374413757029,"score_spread":0.2348044659086966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}