{"id":"W2139087767","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01412.x","title":"THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; State (computer science); Function (biology); Best interests; Psychology; Political science; Law; Empirical research; Social psychology; Public relations; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02134429,0.0001566138,0.000336625,0.00181701,0.005955742,0.005896091,0.001172261,0.002554017,0.001603523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06009775,0.0002353399,0.0001908847,0.001395803,0.011654,0.002692897,0.002077851,0.001786091,0.000187733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01903126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02445789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3489808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6081111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9733831,0.01758515,0.0008546472,0.000812321,0.006140636,0.001224177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967187,0.02238917,0.003569283,0.0004619159,0.005527692,0.0008649383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001420907,0.0000622325,0.05154057,0.001294156,0.0000935939,0.004148644,0.5092881,0.0004129708,0.001807472,0.1658623,0.04520264,0.2201453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003725706,0.00009622757,0.1091449,0.003810935,0.0001361188,0.001792085,0.5026815,0.0004156179,0.001343875,0.03771632,0.3426997,0.0001254849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5019652,0.08805892,0.002582116,0.1464522,0.0005128361,0.00009681694,0.0001057415,0.000018554,0.2602077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753975,0.01437478,0.0008640354,0.00491614,0.0001329726,0.00001700576,0.00002269112,0.000006522651,0.004268221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3489808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.693899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1021398112332396,"score_gpt":0.3762296312118752,"score_spread":0.2740898199786356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}