{"id":"W2139128755","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-14052-5_17","title":"Reasoning with Higher-Order Abstract Syntax and Contexts: A Comparison","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Axiom; Syntax; Set (abstract data type); Inference; Context (archaeology); Formal system; Artificial intelligence; Abstract syntax; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007985697,0.0005910733,0.0007184717,0.0004127761,0.0003661899,0.001110793,0.002016421,0.0004524582,0.00002454294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005227993,0.0004438896,0.00006827345,0.0004233583,0.001076647,0.0005687106,0.0007432353,0.001324721,0.00003348513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001096354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003714526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001553607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005001824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963297,0.00002582926,0.000504387,0.001563257,0.0008763127,0.0007005564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974626,0.0003590603,0.0004515928,0.001181852,0.0002984441,0.0002464125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001743154,0.00006177701,0.001365037,0.0001103532,0.00003892771,0.0002364843,0.001624465,0.0008220235,0.0001929125,0.2336516,0.00002198884,0.761857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004164338,0.003244074,0.01380348,0.002136923,0.0001353688,0.002168623,0.000005326766,0.2188871,0.004717109,0.5778527,0.1646152,0.008269771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002233326,0.001080017,0.9873752,0.0003929766,0.001674859,0.0004488552,0.000001189951,0.0002219864,0.008581555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7815591,0.00001690843,0.2169161,0.0004596521,0.0004189112,0.00001238106,0.000003192661,0.00003548207,0.0005782074],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7813358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01652136302269471,"score_gpt":0.249804418101616,"score_spread":0.2332830550789213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}