{"id":"W2139158984","doi":"10.1142/s0219749908004377","title":"MIXING OF QUANTUM WALKS ON GENERALIZED HYPERCUBES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quantum Information","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Security Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hamming graph; Hypercube; Quantum walk; Combinatorics; Mixing (physics); Mathematics; Circulant matrix; Hamming distance; Adjacency matrix; Hamming code; Discrete mathematics; Quantum; Graph isomorphism; Quantum algorithm; Graph; Line graph; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004863265,0.0003880899,0.0004279459,0.0007637041,0.0006975483,0.001146449,0.00064251,0.0007518768,0.002595018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002337225,0.000250042,0.000420113,0.0006815844,0.001448184,0.002094311,0.001155852,0.0008355328,0.0002296816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007359883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001023481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007818845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994584,0.0001958302,0.000021475,0.00008558412,0.000105155,0.0001335618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986563,0.0006222603,0.0002411426,0.0001939967,0.0001218775,0.0001643705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002034729,0.0001079908,0.0009634675,0.00006165441,0.00003320251,0.000357534,0.0002690641,0.1194381,0.01352473,0.8538671,0.0007813343,0.01039234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003071363,0.00008830284,0.0004764678,0.00001217054,0.00000724708,0.00007407138,0.0001200329,0.6486229,0.004582345,0.3441305,0.00183151,0.00002373103],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271405,0.0003158325,0.1578696,0.0003148156,0.00009281058,0.00006000468,0.0001001226,0.000175268,0.01393108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796534,0.0001451655,0.01700796,0.00007455808,0.00004726219,0.000071906,0.00007505075,0.00003821672,0.00288656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002595018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008681178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01689808476108753,"score_gpt":0.2509277744263116,"score_spread":0.2340296896652241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}