{"id":"W2139203231","doi":"10.1186/1478-7547-3-8","title":"The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","topic":"Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Newborn screening; Cystic fibrosis; Cost effectiveness; Pediatrics; Health economics; Intensive care medicine; Cost–benefit analysis; Disability-adjusted life year; Public health; Internal medicine; Burden of disease; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002056238,0.0001891695,0.0005657187,0.000365606,0.0002744039,0.00003679455,0.0001573272,0.00008620745,0.000002277874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001123486,0.000136045,0.0001766037,0.0006611024,0.000277546,0.0002206734,0.00007694412,0.0001297488,2.123595e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001772343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009908556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001437755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005603413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980177,0.000468903,0.0003727991,0.0004064914,0.0004632061,0.000270952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938663,0.004780774,0.0002400487,0.0003620673,0.0006146084,0.000136253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007761194,0.0001124148,0.00279929,0.0003823253,0.0004652577,6.662273e-7,0.0002489015,0.6446906,0.09264483,0.0001605935,7.170237e-7,0.2507332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002264871,0.000546919,0.08901046,0.001071638,0.000816123,0.000006344587,0.0003193833,0.8650356,0.04050128,0.0001336041,0.0001754911,0.0001182917],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4999633,0.0007797598,0.4976666,0.00001389302,0.00001221316,0.001509989,0.00004228147,0.0000088346,0.000003119107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851841,0.00005193136,0.01424446,0.000007240194,0.00004631982,0.0003254883,0.0001095648,0.00002641335,0.000004500032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4852208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5547755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03786910374925508,"score_gpt":0.3665990575181862,"score_spread":0.3287299537689311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}