{"id":"W2139203231","doi":"10.1186/1478-7547-3-8","title":"The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","topic":"Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Newborn screening; Cystic fibrosis; Cost effectiveness; Pediatrics; Health economics; Intensive care medicine; Cost–benefit analysis; Disability-adjusted life year; Public health; Internal medicine; Burden of disease; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01120315,0.002711684,0.002824257,0.00319462,0.001410103,0.004278505,0.003633718,0.007362113,0.01239141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02491809,0.001791261,0.005405282,0.002774466,0.002258378,0.003442128,0.002419048,0.004779233,0.000615081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01303948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004362626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03937945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01778121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932551,0.005136309,0.000129262,0.0003697894,0.0003022696,0.0008071853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9543176,0.04092411,0.001858471,0.0003637774,0.0009770173,0.001559115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001131442,0.0002022447,0.001958503,0.0001730817,0.00020465,0.0002095837,0.00004677479,0.9894361,0.00008199826,0.004619402,0.0004143275,0.001521769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007129498,0.001128597,0.002172817,0.0001313355,0.000340436,0.0001584703,0.0002578532,0.9867247,0.0001062937,0.007453215,0.0007449448,0.00006845761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8934448,0.004450049,0.05451461,0.006538053,0.0003071906,0.001814165,0.006497581,0.0001495291,0.03228402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837668,0.0009407254,0.009084404,0.0003954489,0.00004461475,0.0007910752,0.000939869,0.00002125741,0.004015935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03937945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09460855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03786910374925508,"score_gpt":0.3665990575181862,"score_spread":0.3287299537689311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}