{"id":"W2139433140","doi":"10.1139/f10-074","title":"Bioenergetics assessment of fish and crayfish consumption by river otter (Lontra canadensis): integrating prey availability, diet, and field metabolic rate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Crayfish; Predation; Otter; Trophic level; Biology; Bioenergetics; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Ecosystem; Catch per unit effort; Piscivore; Fishery; Environmental science; Predator; Abundance (ecology)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000228601,0.0003468857,0.0001985086,0.000745648,0.0002836426,0.0002957743,0.0002021422,0.0001925516,0.0005584871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002972659,0.0001937275,0.0002650708,0.0003636762,0.0001983751,0.0002879663,0.0002328473,0.0001449327,0.00009382952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006739871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003476832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08165355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2740427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998952,0.00001358222,0.00001030241,0.00003959297,0.00002534992,0.00001591598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997138,0.00002967401,0.0001454059,0.00001421586,0.00004431112,0.00005253831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000892836,0.0000718432,0.9849404,0.00002680552,0.00009279343,0.00003300433,0.0001161453,0.0003423821,0.01091906,0.000009188285,0.00004790383,0.003311225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001620649,0.00007995082,0.9990043,0.000001874019,0.00002518412,0.00002685147,0.00005923878,0.0003615895,0.0003924162,0.000003836215,0.00004009589,0.00000310024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995407,0.00006058202,0.00008248054,0.000003246505,4.907664e-7,0.0000045137,0.0001603592,0.000004239193,0.0001435076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985012,0.00007841129,0.0005117078,0.00001052679,0.000001275019,0.00001350956,0.0005474653,0.000002196108,0.0003337421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1623565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01146930305027076,"score_gpt":0.2273626670096543,"score_spread":0.2158933639593835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}