{"id":"W2139565002","doi":"10.1051/forest:2007091","title":"The successional status of sugar maple (Acer saccharum), revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Forest Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Silviculture; Forestry; Geography; Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005804335,0.00006426326,0.0001066442,0.00003683611,0.0006480447,0.000005947605,0.0004023252,0.00002309478,0.0001887035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003532064,0.00004137606,0.00004122522,0.0005077333,0.003247978,0.0002438836,0.0002278959,0.0000582483,0.00004983966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001557701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004412486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001268467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002467829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988453,0.00002569415,0.0002171557,0.0001753238,0.0004016497,0.0003348149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993214,0.0001676466,0.0001646637,0.0001983956,0.00007374745,0.00007411643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001557038,0.00003708421,0.9877008,0.000003918125,0.000004666888,0.00000124855,0.0003464203,0.001191413,0.001382814,0.006585773,0.00222635,0.0005039847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006783546,0.00005893224,0.9913256,0.000008470909,0.000001779944,0.000002719211,0.00005271906,0.001345758,0.001741848,0.003316488,0.002025713,0.00005214256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914618,0.0003050855,0.00009804792,0.0006825124,0.00007069265,0.00007991029,0.000008171969,0.00000640708,0.007287337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978094,0.001119652,0.0003321749,0.0001726343,0.000006117195,0.000004133962,0.000001124381,0.000002368877,0.0005523654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006734971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03172753048809149,"score_gpt":0.3029159854692034,"score_spread":0.2711884549811119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}