{"id":"W2139770987","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8","title":"Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Natural science; The arts; Citation index; Index (typography); Sociology; Social science; Citation; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04525552,0.0001739392,0.0005177922,0.1253716,0.00542787,0.008359406,0.003869884,0.00008531764,0.00007214786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271917,0.0000822153,0.0002550263,0.7556335,0.009273396,0.000741326,0.0006760583,0.0002627693,0.000007017853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003015797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001416098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04476495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1363648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9856075,0.0007139585,0.0007841504,0.0007370177,0.01135666,0.0008007083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883829,0.006461841,0.0006148186,0.0004410485,0.003980749,0.0001185883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003043764,0.0001035751,0.5593642,0.000004297252,0.000162324,0.000001600169,0.002907607,0.02553765,0.00005457737,0.3731199,0.03374213,0.00497169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005735985,0.00006390752,0.6948568,0.00000368098,0.0001239028,0.000001788615,0.003786702,0.2823058,0.00007599826,0.004547621,0.01345998,0.0002002376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516325,0.005537967,0.0006421328,0.004157518,0.00134029,0.0006155912,0.0001291744,0.0000155999,0.03592923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976676,0.00003482786,0.0002069176,0.0003662569,0.00008276635,0.000008522271,0.000003751171,0.000002866187,0.001626534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.630262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4360845501692481,"score_gpt":0.5388048553623775,"score_spread":0.1027203051931294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}