{"id":"W2139778911","doi":"10.1002/etc.363","title":"An aquatic toxicological evaluation of sulfate: The case for considering hardness as a modifying factor in setting water quality guidelines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Teck (Canada); Nautilus Environmental","funders":"","keywords":"Sulfate; Water quality; Invertebrate; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Toxicity; Hard water; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Toxicology; Chemistry; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008274035,0.0005842903,0.0006887525,0.0008968342,0.0004432761,0.001206393,0.0009930327,0.0009116129,0.0009711893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01521253,0.0002449693,0.0008080432,0.001224167,0.0009877726,0.0008538398,0.000956297,0.0006709577,0.0001110796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004066285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0580356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1329468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938719,0.00245751,0.0003323351,0.0003760998,0.002755046,0.0002070071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193,0.004031236,0.0007802936,0.0007518462,0.00231067,0.0001959376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003080985,0.0008963784,0.4916381,0.001933553,0.001651901,0.0009947907,0.001140355,0.09685806,0.1405111,0.01159962,0.005630627,0.2440646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001945083,0.008917587,0.7195772,0.000316421,0.001101978,0.0004781302,0.001462458,0.1138315,0.1098125,0.01405768,0.02995136,0.0002986147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9217567,0.001921863,0.05244388,0.002467531,0.00009647036,0.0004888113,0.001072463,0.0001543101,0.019598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969935,0.0004961122,0.02705507,0.0004764153,0.00001993145,0.00007856554,0.0002235837,0.00002527899,0.001690104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0580356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1153956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05869656524520156,"score_gpt":0.3471134730082455,"score_spread":0.288416907763044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}