{"id":"W2139835321","doi":"10.1093/aob/mct040","title":"Ecological context and metapopulation dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Botany","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Biology; Metapopulation; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Sex ratio; Dioecy; Affect (linguistics); Variation (astronomy); Sex allocation; Demography; Population; Biological dispersal; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001403496,0.0000941423,0.000184967,0.000009216098,0.0001723853,0.00004277521,0.00005852736,0.00007067562,0.0001046772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006422888,0.00003749193,0.00005081822,0.0000887257,0.00004757186,0.0001834844,0.00003588737,0.00004940424,0.00001265079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006507451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001298377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009700143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01217193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993405,0.00005468289,0.0001968951,0.0001495336,0.0001122603,0.0001461211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996013,0.0001512939,0.0001170138,0.00001672521,0.0000646996,0.0000489548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002525988,0.0001568206,0.885446,0.000007956916,0.00006372727,0.000002606714,0.0001634707,0.0000132971,0.05601812,0.007070403,0.001854715,0.04917765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004737929,0.0002356378,0.9930625,0.000008238134,0.00001116727,0.000001953897,0.0001551436,0.003877651,0.0001809525,0.002210985,0.0001173897,0.00009098026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979089,0.0001944012,0.00001500069,0.001118344,0.0000309355,0.0002141335,0.00007484358,0.00002955569,0.0004138668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994571,0.00009208062,0.00003463647,0.0001282842,0.00006412388,0.00001567396,0.00005838974,5.432129e-7,0.0001491843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1076166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6792222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08455354318611802,"score_gpt":0.25739915415071,"score_spread":0.172845610964592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}