{"id":"W2139835321","doi":"10.1093/aob/mct040","title":"Ecological context and metapopulation dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Botany","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Biology; Metapopulation; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Sex ratio; Dioecy; Affect (linguistics); Variation (astronomy); Sex allocation; Demography; Population; Biological dispersal; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007407686,0.0001687934,0.0002346471,0.0006332971,0.0002741916,0.0006122987,0.0003533181,0.0002782033,0.0009475274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002487558,0.0001421906,0.0002753056,0.0003601881,0.0003920115,0.0004169345,0.0003693153,0.0002015058,0.00007561974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004606491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001944029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002165914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006255026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99979,0.0001057182,0.00001493839,0.00004953011,0.00001714495,0.00002266333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988183,0.0006889098,0.0002528132,0.00007922217,0.00007195226,0.00008874747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001444319,0.00005788666,0.9492359,0.0001063313,0.0003773637,0.00028384,0.0008037848,0.009093447,0.02447738,0.002083376,0.0001271485,0.01320913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001524508,0.00007357282,0.9762967,0.0000124835,0.0001041571,0.0001987065,0.0004364518,0.0204372,0.0006743845,0.001488463,0.0002484092,0.00001431226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991717,0.0001009179,0.0004523104,0.00001321605,7.214938e-7,0.000001804869,0.00001818811,0.000004322618,0.0002368507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997553,0.00003558208,0.0001598025,0.000004365168,8.217473e-7,0.000001138428,0.00001973879,0.000001409062,0.00002185029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002165914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004306614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08455354318611802,"score_gpt":0.25739915415071,"score_spread":0.172845610964592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}