{"id":"W2139924880","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016444","title":"Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Harm; Clinical equipoise; Miller; Research ethics; Test (biology); Psychological intervention; Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Engineering ethics; Duty; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Political science; Business; Law; Social psychology; Engineering; Biology; Pathology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1074897,0.001514369,0.002377163,0.001923999,0.008641812,0.009674158,0.00738094,0.0819503,0.003617086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2866226,0.001329742,0.003181207,0.002128233,0.03522972,0.01552473,0.01025607,0.1005775,0.001944635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01008983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01353182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00529918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005619597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8768148,0.0748622,0.00985021,0.00959703,0.02569732,0.00317845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6753587,0.2772557,0.007420263,0.004862584,0.02900635,0.006096505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009586583,0.00007064956,0.0007226754,0.0001951536,0.00004323996,0.0008349153,0.006460435,0.0002506809,0.000502684,0.127586,0.8472971,0.01594064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003040786,0.000248992,0.001352769,0.002088381,0.00007987948,0.00299151,0.01358539,0.001995763,0.001352906,0.2150156,0.7604932,0.0004916032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004015951,0.000592307,0.0007121199,0.9935267,0.003965775,0.00001413175,0.00001458692,0.00001685168,0.0007559894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006356803,0.0003789749,0.001834291,0.9858374,0.004653902,0.0000744577,0.000008502489,0.00002770522,0.0008279108],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5684664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.835670536432955,"score_gpt":0.7275577684054344,"score_spread":0.1081127680275206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}