{"id":"W2139924880","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016444","title":"Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Harm; Clinical equipoise; Miller; Research ethics; Test (biology); Psychological intervention; Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Engineering ethics; Duty; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Political science; Business; Law; Social psychology; Engineering; Biology; Pathology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5383564,0.0002028249,0.0007731317,0.0005431366,0.0006955789,0.0002366885,0.001053753,0.003034408,0.000227264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8855917,0.0001145168,0.0001947517,0.001018736,0.002021764,0.0001133699,0.0007920508,0.04829191,0.00004143573],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003325486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009783038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001654881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003248642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9555735,0.006455775,0.003457403,0.0005543684,0.03252887,0.001430104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1713054,0.8104399,0.0008659166,0.001306575,0.01209775,0.003984368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06583931,0.008968503,0.1889646,0.04668725,0.003455111,0.06665679,0.1272469,0.0001070629,0.04980421,0.1300232,0.09319382,0.2190532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01911692,0.01954498,0.4626891,0.1730763,0.0009554119,0.02061041,0.07208174,0.005363617,0.002398322,0.1052324,0.1174507,0.001480231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5097662,0.001914831,0.007027916,0.4771201,0.0005898912,0.0005662506,0.000001975673,0.0000226527,0.002990203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790149,0.003104485,0.007437558,0.008098817,0.001685448,0.00000515323,3.174192e-7,0.00004086676,0.0006124714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.835670536432955,"score_gpt":0.7275577684054344,"score_spread":0.1081127680275206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}