{"id":"W2139981419","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2015.03.007","title":"Calibration without reduction for non-expected utility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Calibration; Axiom; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Decision maker; Reduction (mathematics); Prospect theory; Class (philosophy); Subjective expected utility; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005986569,0.001188856,0.001868403,0.001039852,0.0006002978,0.002253216,0.002704508,0.00323817,0.01614854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04522314,0.000859882,0.00153518,0.0008523242,0.001734818,0.005337339,0.003388973,0.004832693,0.002361519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001120399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001009778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006676841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000450015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953511,0.002121697,0.0001643432,0.001077232,0.0008419874,0.0004436551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845074,0.008641253,0.0005847569,0.004966292,0.001079645,0.0002206354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004958575,0.0003899827,0.001401771,0.000466768,0.0002163815,0.0003301536,0.0001937409,0.1284424,0.007968935,0.7138242,0.01067372,0.135596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009039987,0.00009139162,0.0009675685,0.00006934927,0.00006285041,0.0002452232,0.00003540741,0.4070608,0.003597392,0.5832304,0.004493254,0.00005600222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03326673,0.0005601673,0.9360328,0.00307022,0.0004003028,0.0001322651,0.0002800272,0.001132639,0.0251248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832609,0.0004509199,0.1421789,0.001096192,0.0004128048,0.0002046902,0.0003224678,0.0005431451,0.02218189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01614854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05402225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1963726538816846,"score_gpt":0.4241549731591244,"score_spread":0.2277823192774399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}