{"id":"W2140026356","doi":"10.25336/p65p73","title":"An Evaluation of the Pearsonian Type I Curve of Fertility for Aboriginal Populations in Canada, 1996 to 2001","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Demography; Geography; Birth rate; Census; Population; Statistics; Mathematics; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03621351,0.0006507839,0.0006839712,0.003489221,0.001225606,0.002110588,0.002743219,0.001093578,0.002165127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1516127,0.0003709518,0.002013486,0.005712531,0.001954429,0.00138441,0.0016451,0.001368654,0.0004962729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01256744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01286069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5062907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2438738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880934,0.004805398,0.0005388936,0.001867681,0.003883447,0.000811132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9039377,0.04791902,0.009797769,0.009932107,0.02704167,0.001371643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004954904,0.00003440221,0.7945233,0.0002222222,0.0004342835,0.0003090574,0.002423157,0.1204445,0.0001970909,0.01896756,0.008274437,0.0536745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005056663,0.0004376889,0.7295415,0.0003560717,0.0002404553,0.0008970624,0.003367004,0.2349601,0.0007112208,0.009038715,0.02023953,0.0001601665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8469007,0.003706692,0.08269004,0.002805191,0.0002070383,0.0008160322,0.01023483,0.001761299,0.05087821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812996,0.0007741657,0.0107836,0.0001908639,0.00002925095,0.0001622947,0.004533812,0.0002278308,0.001998646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4937093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1889349842205765,"score_gpt":0.4382346206132467,"score_spread":0.2492996363926702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}