{"id":"W2140026356","doi":"10.25336/p65p73","title":"An Evaluation of the Pearsonian Type I Curve of Fertility for Aboriginal Populations in Canada, 1996 to 2001","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Demography; Geography; Birth rate; Census; Population; Statistics; Mathematics; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001523412,0.00007679797,0.0001789602,0.000235051,0.0002965879,0.000003982479,0.0001754293,0.00003694665,0.00001240751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004681124,0.00007601648,0.00003250714,0.001026599,0.0001161879,0.0001156623,0.00000879182,0.00005416184,2.595521e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002433777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001934002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983603,0.0003201209,0.0003606906,0.0001748464,0.0005064537,0.0002776362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.00003472214,0.0001251565,0.0002252553,0.0004682412,0.0000909863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009366485,0.00001464522,0.9868706,0.00001256764,0.000008698672,4.459028e-7,0.004929956,0.004547725,0.000001097587,0.002076337,0.0004306069,0.001097975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001652075,0.00001444956,0.9938083,0.00002771988,0.00001916054,5.96317e-8,0.003057199,0.0008940786,0.000002136464,0.001313436,0.0006245249,0.00007373952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967632,0.0002027165,0.000004043066,0.0003840069,0.0007064365,0.001085523,0.00006495581,0.000003419151,0.0007856793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999586,0.0000262083,0.0001845363,0.00006550025,0.0000363289,0.00005398543,0.00001918556,0.000005589802,0.0000226782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006937711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6364241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1889349842205765,"score_gpt":0.4382346206132467,"score_spread":0.2492996363926702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}