{"id":"W2140099453","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.003","title":"Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trends in Genetics","topic":"Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":710,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogenomics; Concatenation (mathematics); Biology; Tree (set theory); Supergene (geology); Contrast (vision); Evolutionary biology; Computational biology; Gene; Phylogenetics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Paleontology; Genetics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Clade","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04127457808234716,"score_gpt":0.3273409802350387,"score_spread":0.2860664021526915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["not_applicable"],"consensus_intersection":[],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.00007629510948348211,"metaepi_narrow":0.00010681315327687495,"metaepi_broad":0.00010681315327687495,"bibliometrics":0.00030518043793392844,"sts":0.000045777065690089265,"scholarly_communication":0.00007629510948348211,"open_science":0.00016784924086366064,"research_integrity":0.000030518043793392844,"randomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0,"observational":0.0041809719996948195,"systematic_review":0.001998931868467231,"meta_analysis":0.00018310826276035706,"case_report":0.00009155413138017853,"qualitative":0.000030518043793392844,"simulation_or_modeling":0.000030518043793392844,"bench_or_experimental":0.00022888532845044633,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.0003356984817273213,"not_applicable":0.00473029678797589,"design_other":0.9433279926756695},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.000030518043793392844,"metaepi_narrow":0.000030518043793392844,"metaepi_broad":0.00016784924086366064,"bibliometrics":0.00007629510948348211,"sts":0.0001373311970702678,"scholarly_communication":0,"open_science":0.0001373311970702678,"research_integrity":0.00016784924086366064,"randomized_trial":0,"nonrandomized_trial":0.00006103608758678569,"observational":0.005188067444876783,"systematic_review":0.00032043945983062486,"meta_analysis":0.00006103608758678569,"case_report":0.000030518043793392844,"qualitative":0.000015259021896696422,"simulation_or_modeling":0.00009155413138017853,"bench_or_experimental":0.0007782101167315176,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.0011444266422522317,"not_applicable":0.9315785458152133}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}