{"id":"W2140198391","doi":"10.1007/s10479-009-0532-5","title":"Approximating zero-variance importance sampling in a reliability setting","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Mathematical optimization; Interpolation (computer graphics); Importance sampling; Applied mathematics; Approximation error; Function (biology); Mathematics; Markov chain; Bounded function; Heuristics; Computer science; Variance (accounting); Reliability (semiconductor); Parameterized complexity; Monte Carlo method; Algorithm; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02051743,0.001451316,0.003173007,0.00207659,0.0005551163,0.002035595,0.004036225,0.002698824,0.001722448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08186818,0.001626984,0.001516344,0.002211301,0.00285797,0.003846057,0.002720702,0.003424773,0.0002969803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001514357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001464639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004242745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002237962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907262,0.005978169,0.0003220359,0.000988626,0.001472746,0.000512109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9195136,0.07063358,0.002432953,0.003421019,0.00317712,0.0008216554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000290009,0.000110096,0.002098133,0.0002103454,0.0001224133,0.0001445943,0.0001409404,0.8680423,0.000686286,0.09708997,0.0009177332,0.03014715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001409448,0.00002529894,0.0001319134,0.000008518503,0.00001376313,0.000026204,0.000007378747,0.9760094,0.0001569298,0.02349122,0.0001080265,0.000007262979],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01324238,0.0002403081,0.985887,0.0001398566,0.00002781076,0.00002910157,0.0000205147,0.00006864403,0.0003443228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7036507,0.0006986958,0.2921638,0.0001590817,0.0002918328,0.0002541949,0.0002426067,0.0001035439,0.002435563],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02051743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5793130532141241,"score_gpt":0.5796847489334721,"score_spread":0.0003716957193480308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}