{"id":"W2140242606","doi":"10.1139/l05-030","title":"Stochastic control for risk under deregulated electricity market — a case study using a new formulation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflow; Stochastic programming; Mathematical optimization; Minification; Computer science; Discretization; Stochastic optimization; Stochastic control; Dynamic programming; Hydropower; Electricity market; State variable; Risk management; Electricity; Dual (grammatical number); Optimal control; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001474364,0.0005628529,0.0006707081,0.0003587169,0.0003276168,0.001306875,0.0008186681,0.001201773,0.001508998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001927318,0.0002887559,0.0007012556,0.0003750482,0.000817139,0.001036516,0.0008832028,0.001386333,0.00006485019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001309086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001214235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005281672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003845131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994563,0.0002870195,0.00001856177,0.00006748047,0.0001227034,0.00004780083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989008,0.0008028416,0.0001162778,0.00003823629,0.0001057463,0.00003619621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001317851,0.00001770018,0.0001493337,0.00001971992,0.000007600465,0.0001332641,0.00002495969,0.9644699,0.0003143926,0.03111802,0.0001509688,0.003581071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005322847,0.0000108586,0.00004205263,0.000002478441,0.000002938311,0.00001809871,0.000006852638,0.9961052,0.00009783955,0.003497331,0.0002082355,0.000002881872],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047188,0.0004563217,0.8818163,0.0007891157,0.00005630065,0.00007704639,0.00008361066,0.00007693934,0.0119255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384469,0.0003365463,0.05640201,0.0000464828,0.00004740891,0.00009195989,0.00003658631,0.00002418534,0.004567934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005281672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01050186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009560033105238334,"score_gpt":0.1895677372884314,"score_spread":0.1800077041831931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}