{"id":"W2140285266","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00111.x","title":"Developing robust frequentist and Bayesian fish stock assessment methods","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"State of Maine Department of Marine Resources","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Outlier; Stock assessment; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Fish stock; Stock (firearms); Fishery; Statistics; Data mining; Bayesian inference; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Fishing; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01294992,0.0009749421,0.00142378,0.002923062,0.0005154251,0.001473961,0.002710592,0.00143787,0.002407988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04286838,0.001078188,0.00165732,0.001326204,0.001002423,0.0025397,0.002793127,0.001617752,0.0007340708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001240367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001862768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004807108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00441756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994422,0.002412002,0.0004791075,0.0006206507,0.001870057,0.0001961711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762568,0.01571789,0.002054949,0.001321783,0.004338133,0.0003104965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008271118,0.00005508607,0.002594294,0.0001426065,0.000253877,0.00008789761,0.0001656858,0.6771647,0.001205431,0.06851214,0.001489991,0.2482455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011778,0.00001391001,0.0002416014,0.00001645813,0.000017035,0.00002504931,0.000009660169,0.9774383,0.0003868647,0.02118229,0.0006450341,0.00001199438],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001672965,0.00005268852,0.9978827,0.0000419667,0.000006580882,0.00002164904,0.00001726466,0.00008347239,0.0002207863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08411621,0.0002009763,0.9141383,0.00006689195,0.00006367917,0.000257971,0.0001807896,0.0000903345,0.0008849249],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01294992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06848651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04141747934346307,"score_gpt":0.3152207587420752,"score_spread":0.2738032793986121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}