{"id":"W2140285266","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00111.x","title":"Developing robust frequentist and Bayesian fish stock assessment methods","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"State of Maine Department of Marine Resources","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Outlier; Stock assessment; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Fish stock; Stock (firearms); Fishery; Statistics; Data mining; Bayesian inference; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Fishing; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004893204,0.0001909744,0.0002214991,0.00003124514,0.0003652731,0.0002710773,0.0001388972,0.0000995439,0.006757419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001301223,0.0001795294,0.00003088991,0.000167128,0.0003961423,0.0004312358,0.0002812236,0.0002170281,0.000004229037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008455667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003656363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001073778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985329,0.0001846873,0.0002188111,0.0004193154,0.0002345681,0.0004097196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994362,0.00009326731,0.00005042511,0.0002188947,0.00001324759,0.0001879539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001150777,0.00003071809,0.8394831,0.00005412083,0.00002628766,0.00002423613,0.0003356551,0.000001864721,0.0001122347,0.001564562,0.02719808,0.1311577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002814845,0.00008422245,0.2457778,0.000006649989,0.000009557527,0.00004143853,0.0003119024,0.0002866944,0.0001806801,0.001875924,0.7508468,0.0002968727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06474837,0.00003218807,0.06552156,0.005486419,0.0002539697,0.0004741242,0.00002873415,0.0000974951,0.8633571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1383287,0.001255517,0.8200257,0.008101962,0.000145309,0.0002476427,0.00008740863,0.0001143532,0.03169345],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8316637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04141747934346307,"score_gpt":0.3152207587420752,"score_spread":0.2738032793986121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}