{"id":"W2140359507","doi":"10.1139/x09-105","title":"Relative abundance and species richness of cerambycid beetles in partial cut and uncut bottomland hardwood forests","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Snag; Slash (logging); Species richness; Clearcutting; Logging; Hardwood; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Coarse woody debris; Biology; Habitat; Salvage logging; Environmental science; Endangered species; Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001374968,0.0001690024,0.0001478943,0.0006165172,0.0003656273,0.0003143939,0.0001252315,0.0001396419,0.0006544258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002452967,0.0001247164,0.00009218436,0.0002743304,0.0002510762,0.000186852,0.0002392163,0.0001309303,0.00008401182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005533806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001832348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03289768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2135388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999892,0.00001744889,0.000008114961,0.00003518946,0.00001963874,0.00002753907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997012,0.00003108884,0.0001015717,0.0000150911,0.00005573245,0.00009525614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001463232,0.00002799375,0.9898504,0.00001470041,0.00003192161,0.00004758575,0.0003783513,0.00006639839,0.006487221,0.00001240925,0.00005379649,0.002882926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001037091,0.00001951511,0.9996164,0.000001603085,0.000003533792,0.00002388582,0.0001741542,0.00003251561,0.0000926333,0.000002552994,0.00003118969,9.434194e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999874,0.00002690023,0.000006181656,0.00000135621,1.417304e-7,7.117631e-7,0.0000384924,5.323823e-7,0.00005155575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996575,0.00002760888,0.00004312136,0.00000658128,4.54931e-7,0.000002123546,0.0001570308,4.73307e-7,0.0001050389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03289768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0654124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04693023287758476,"score_gpt":0.2678508139755554,"score_spread":0.2209205810979706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}