{"id":"W2140416388","doi":"10.1109/aps.1996.549750","title":"Large electromagnetic scattering computation using iterative progressive numerical method","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Iterative method; Computation; Integral equation; Scattering; Cylinder; Iterative and incremental development; Moment (physics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Electromagnetic field; Method of moments (probability theory); Mathematical analysis; Physics; Mathematics; Computer science; Algorithm; Optics; Geometry; Classical mechanics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006051092,0.00041679,0.0004520559,0.0004058801,0.0003833557,0.0005177779,0.000899021,0.0005002758,0.003367389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002986829,0.000195748,0.0003917173,0.0004874457,0.000444917,0.0006284676,0.0008098481,0.0005568356,0.0007371005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008221584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002332886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002476207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997395,0.00007956141,0.000008396746,0.00001960345,0.0001322318,0.00002067721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990414,0.000503357,0.00005654416,0.0001308151,0.0002376134,0.00003026348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008836205,0.00004092712,0.0009189675,0.0001477544,0.00003493812,0.0002815541,0.0002661443,0.7883376,0.01320952,0.08458807,0.002311071,0.1097752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007749026,0.00001321942,0.00006543191,0.000004411827,0.000002413368,0.00003680022,0.000008058496,0.9907061,0.001316299,0.006224407,0.001611388,0.000003730433],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01433946,0.00007299172,0.9767579,0.00007965969,0.00002419409,0.0000435753,0.00002839119,0.000471462,0.008182318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2824735,0.0002139288,0.7116074,0.00005260832,0.00002634296,0.0001869536,0.00008646127,0.0001536751,0.005199182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003367389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01126504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01519461163424503,"score_gpt":0.2942410832064609,"score_spread":0.2790464715722158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}