{"id":"W2140513323","doi":"10.2298/saj0979101s","title":"PR and PL (PMv) relations for classical Cepheids revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","topic":"Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cepheid variable; Physics; Cosmic distance ladder; Astrophysics; RADIUS; Angular diameter; COSMIC cancer database; Luminosity; Astronomy; Brightness; Relation (database); Galaxy; Stars","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001525421,0.000174746,0.0002742653,0.00005246394,0.0003315726,0.0001281555,0.0001071485,0.00004973972,0.0003019016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000180302,0.0001536503,0.0001439991,0.00005205166,0.0000658543,0.000143593,0.00002105099,0.0003481312,0.00003718018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000323537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000501075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003590888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.336102e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989736,0.00004284424,0.0003304925,0.0002106919,0.00009637915,0.0003459552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.0001580999,0.0001315516,0.0001150979,0.00004942595,0.00023665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009756256,0.00008597242,0.926686,0.000003017349,0.0001425475,0.000001032127,0.0001355604,0.00006657847,0.00003057133,0.006010009,0.01211318,0.05462794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00133998,0.0002586495,0.9728503,0.00003493802,0.0001162004,0.00001634228,0.0001593334,0.001066054,0.00002644538,0.006127662,0.01778895,0.0002151802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652127,0.0007319723,0.05877145,0.01283515,0.0007011031,0.0007689516,0.0000812423,0.0000704934,0.06082698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904643,0.00000588497,0.007088476,0.0001106538,0.001652659,0.000003457246,0.00003820084,0.00001164679,0.0006247381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1252516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6265677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01041118645113034,"score_gpt":0.2361883834035912,"score_spread":0.2257771969524608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}