{"id":"W2140536332","doi":"10.4039/n07-ls02","title":"Saproxylic insect assemblages in Canadian forests: diversity, ecology, and conservation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Entomologist","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Threatened species; Habitat; Biodiversity; Biology; Forest management; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002962727,0.000102047,0.000124014,0.0000582972,0.00211333,0.00002156293,0.0002787422,0.0001566687,0.0001084983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001220733,0.00004302932,0.00002727943,0.000265436,0.0007206249,0.0000703051,0.0001541627,0.0001531759,0.00004877498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000342151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001278064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990822,0.00009317463,0.00008948632,0.0001882588,0.00006661993,0.0004802278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.0001462635,0.00003369595,0.00004631421,0.00003787211,0.0002537221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005794451,0.000006730324,0.9940322,0.000001064361,0.00000911069,0.0001563809,0.000215718,0.000001280895,0.00001427523,0.0007035911,0.004624797,0.0002290788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000988854,0.00007745533,0.9912449,0.000002189925,0.000006200516,0.00005504331,0.0002126498,0.00001161182,0.00001069533,0.000749197,0.00742956,0.0001016075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697313,0.0001158217,1.313493e-8,0.02814748,0.00009973773,0.00018456,0.0000609582,0.00001635263,0.001643825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996372,0.0001072361,0.00000312286,0.003117117,0.00003220719,0.000006543379,0.00003973714,3.920163e-7,0.0003216461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02664074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04839163906120633,"score_gpt":0.2092599513523762,"score_spread":0.1608683122911699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}