{"id":"W2140536332","doi":"10.4039/n07-ls02","title":"Saproxylic insect assemblages in Canadian forests: diversity, ecology, and conservation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Entomologist","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Threatened species; Habitat; Biodiversity; Biology; Forest management; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000363137,0.000248375,0.0001706912,0.002397956,0.002171791,0.0008160049,0.0004547468,0.0001208976,0.002240434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006723185,0.0001258619,0.0001144621,0.002746103,0.0006321914,0.0003135644,0.000485988,0.0001803257,0.0001079206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008839338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007227007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996699,0.00001758084,0.000008803468,0.00004458873,0.0001415021,0.0001176241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993048,0.00003433603,0.0000960146,0.00001588599,0.0003596383,0.0001893147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001625744,0.00004359827,0.9076875,0.0002085047,0.00005594425,0.000134109,0.003531701,0.0002570041,0.004005151,0.0004489697,0.003414931,0.08004994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001906086,0.000009747816,0.9967877,0.00001638057,0.00000726189,0.00003900157,0.0009653638,0.000108758,0.0000985416,0.00002609377,0.001934825,0.000004567716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923009,0.001813694,0.0001561838,0.0001312614,0.000006822451,0.00002282964,0.001462941,0.00001160169,0.004093733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965519,0.0009302034,0.0004629645,0.0000370013,0.000003239626,0.000007084825,0.0007502135,0.000002482595,0.001254956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01389939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06413418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04839163906120633,"score_gpt":0.2092599513523762,"score_spread":0.1608683122911699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}