{"id":"W2140598376","doi":"10.1109/icsm.1995.526535","title":"Design maintenance: unexpected architectural interactions (experience report)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; IBM (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Computer science; Code (set theory); Software engineering; Systems design; Systems engineering; Programming language; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009642468,0.0009414815,0.0003849888,0.001765034,0.002295146,0.002596346,0.002401474,0.002682289,0.004053473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04682346,0.0008649732,0.0007295183,0.001308028,0.00192999,0.003008222,0.002556529,0.002802666,0.001575854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001358626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001542942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003670979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009486152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914125,0.003182314,0.0004390991,0.0008786007,0.003477385,0.0006101379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647948,0.0171169,0.003330809,0.006963697,0.00573234,0.002061457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006369138,0.00295145,0.04945227,0.001101619,0.0002175909,0.01269712,0.09968604,0.005432324,0.01919585,0.005817204,0.09064894,0.7121627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004937924,0.005757792,0.07705544,0.001075826,0.0007237445,0.04575199,0.03748462,0.02531121,0.05869979,0.009925593,0.7371592,0.0005609313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8075178,0.003174501,0.1257517,0.01013861,0.0006128539,0.000428112,0.0006991103,0.007450135,0.04422713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9108607,0.001848633,0.05485255,0.00244408,0.0002330482,0.0001887048,0.001404433,0.001596967,0.02657087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009642468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05099487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0445186824504735,"score_gpt":0.2870970631887051,"score_spread":0.2425783807382316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}