{"id":"W2140687383","doi":"10.1177/0920203x09105126","title":"Judicial Interpretation of China's Supreme People's Court as “Secondary Law” with Special Reference to Criminal Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Information","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; Law of the case; Certiorari; Court of record; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003007228,0.000314978,0.0003544989,0.002998447,0.005256452,0.005648431,0.0009452785,0.001457164,0.002646723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003736311,0.0001777789,0.000422441,0.002782551,0.01054344,0.002541121,0.001507634,0.001746583,0.0001319192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01301877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0121084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06721036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1255397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971858,0.0009774793,0.0001496707,0.0004426829,0.0006883153,0.0005561048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.0005345907,0.0001894097,0.0001726738,0.0004361251,0.0001481084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006084168,0.000004334992,0.002430499,0.0000263395,0.000006389837,0.0002489296,0.00607794,0.0001658111,0.0003085283,0.9823679,0.002682433,0.005674761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005492116,0.0001306699,0.0737384,0.0005046777,0.000145598,0.0006575838,0.01272193,0.01125571,0.003762088,0.658944,0.2379234,0.0001609804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4661463,0.003848738,0.01426216,0.02273315,0.0006744887,0.0001605981,0.0002695125,0.00009536698,0.4918098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875431,0.000340392,0.0009891171,0.0009096058,0.00008763073,0.00002265769,0.00004723809,0.000007791084,0.01005251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06721036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1336383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0114102761271608,"score_gpt":0.2649508096031606,"score_spread":0.2535405334759999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}