{"id":"W2140895449","doi":"10.22230/jripe.2011v2n1a48","title":"Harnessing Complexity Science for Interprofessional Education Development: A Case Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Ottawa; Bruyère","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Complexity science; Negotiation; Creativity; Interprofessional education; Curriculum; Process (computing); Collaborative learning; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Health care; Engineering; Political science; Social psychology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01265137,0.000710603,0.0005070055,0.001716112,0.01249604,0.004127644,0.002396339,0.003737674,0.002588411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01863801,0.0006601762,0.0007913227,0.001553869,0.005301261,0.003825196,0.009550888,0.003971815,0.0004634822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004142068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004073783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001809532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005211113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859865,0.01040154,0.0003855502,0.0004252121,0.001283017,0.001518191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803433,0.01279182,0.001204013,0.001038756,0.001112628,0.003509296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000250574,0.004303003,0.02218843,0.0009274798,0.00005979337,0.05112718,0.8045281,0.001863582,0.002925214,0.01767088,0.004416171,0.08973956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001602141,0.001527537,0.009837288,0.0008466212,0.00005703667,0.0318927,0.8767927,0.004412643,0.005843488,0.006930783,0.06156011,0.0001389535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599389,0.0006374408,0.01919946,0.004768205,0.00009839108,0.0007761568,0.00004313665,0.00004032521,0.01449793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776161,0.00109496,0.01626894,0.0005919641,0.00005426452,0.0005617047,0.00003364088,0.00002524839,0.003753195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01265137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06690764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3467768892258417,"score_gpt":0.6290062019925726,"score_spread":0.2822293127667309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}