{"id":"W2140895449","doi":"10.22230/jripe.2011v2n1a48","title":"Harnessing Complexity Science for Interprofessional Education Development: A Case Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Ottawa; Bruyère","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Complexity science; Negotiation; Creativity; Interprofessional education; Curriculum; Process (computing); Collaborative learning; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Health care; Engineering; Political science; Social psychology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155686,0.000212856,0.0003467636,0.002163256,0.002499716,0.00008043299,0.0004875193,0.0001883766,0.0002786204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004196556,0.0001693765,0.0000532324,0.001476902,0.0004752273,0.002796909,0.0003191073,0.002095397,0.00003104686],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001149315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07705896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001473365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006812966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939149,0.002302326,0.001581791,0.0004422942,0.001156886,0.0006018304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881654,0.002718794,0.001150094,0.0002861483,0.007302633,0.0003769004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01880877,0.02263638,0.2449979,0.001038163,0.0001409407,0.0001831518,0.4619787,8.505237e-7,0.002569813,0.03086054,0.01264572,0.2041391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001214209,0.0006252122,0.04126447,0.004613159,0.00003249594,0.0008769981,0.9316278,0.00008890356,0.0001551423,0.01378014,0.005491173,0.0002303243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814435,0.0003178524,0.0003988609,0.003497798,0.008155385,0.00184017,0.000002688308,0.00001355057,0.00433024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675131,0.00001982626,0.02851869,0.0008264853,0.0007386096,0.0006694993,0.00001026449,0.00002672754,0.001676831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4696491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3467768892258417,"score_gpt":0.6290062019925726,"score_spread":0.2822293127667309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}