{"id":"W2140921887","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2003.1226140","title":"The utility of graph theoretic software metrics: a case study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Software sizing; Software; Software metric; Call graph; Theoretical computer science; Software construction; Software development; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Class (philosophy); Graph; Software visualization; Data mining; Software engineering; Object-oriented programming; Programming language; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00963413,0.0008220502,0.0006059697,0.003400304,0.002127899,0.002234004,0.001846801,0.002967574,0.001296338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234647,0.0002953218,0.0006585647,0.005522104,0.003267072,0.003265101,0.001964418,0.001777692,0.0002094719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002936022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001120076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008869536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01724683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908901,0.00695253,0.0002477765,0.0002863125,0.001378302,0.000244944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9407449,0.05094388,0.00168847,0.002534261,0.003232062,0.0008564491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001043008,0.003959041,0.1013309,0.00156097,0.0002452449,0.02830682,0.04181223,0.1159208,0.009424111,0.3182141,0.01980229,0.3583804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000578343,0.003627411,0.06249777,0.0008612587,0.0003142694,0.01731475,0.04769014,0.5019792,0.01958575,0.2463865,0.09881646,0.0003481675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8915313,0.001344652,0.08236028,0.004264119,0.00004862403,0.0004318663,0.0004239335,0.000323797,0.01927138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282471,0.0007430938,0.06861665,0.0001793809,0.00002569339,0.000163033,0.0001725937,0.0001257766,0.001726765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00963413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05095071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02357353648345216,"score_gpt":0.288105597269525,"score_spread":0.2645320607860728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}