{"id":"W2141045703","doi":"10.1016/s1054-3139(03)00006-7","title":"An overview of seabed-mapping technologies in the context of marine habitat classification☆","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":344,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning","keywords":"Seabed; Geology; Context (archaeology); Benthic zone; Sediment; Habitat; Benthic habitat; Bathymetry; Bedform; Marine habitats; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Oceanography; Sediment transport; Geomorphology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052267,0.00008179487,0.000243875,0.0003827044,0.0001182562,0.00002540651,0.001233226,0.0000607107,0.0005402794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009256082,0.00004867281,0.00004645423,0.001041891,0.001276622,0.0004609168,0.00007758268,0.0002909827,0.000005367767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006790909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002456309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003112289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002791108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984736,0.0002422723,0.0004849404,0.0001540437,0.0003852887,0.0002597872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985764,0.0004314475,0.0004303014,0.0002575595,0.0002574734,0.00004679296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002827113,0.0000472346,0.9276015,0.00002602962,0.000006221914,0.000006927375,0.0001572996,0.00004139418,0.0005929117,0.001434903,0.00001992655,0.07003738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002116046,0.0004200149,0.9902054,0.00001755223,0.000004728259,0.00008611212,0.003493095,0.0005638928,0.0006970498,0.003413521,0.00083384,0.00005318964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890816,0.0005483247,0.000007066137,0.0007712791,0.0001328261,0.00009856711,0.000002356612,0.000004573555,0.009353443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980675,0.0007388922,0.001089011,0.00006064332,0.00001189348,5.635014e-7,0.000002107285,8.977501e-7,0.0000285085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06998419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.591568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0791567761512984,"score_gpt":0.3219411851224623,"score_spread":0.2427844089711639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}