{"id":"W2141107993","doi":"10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00576.x","title":"Multimodality in the individual size distributions of bird communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center For Environmental Assessment; McGill University","keywords":"Ecology; Breeding bird survey; Community; Resource distribution; Community structure; Consistency (knowledge bases); Biology; Distribution (mathematics); Biogeography; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009104937,0.0001285826,0.0002566786,0.001532304,0.0002717268,0.0006782797,0.000221955,0.0002112775,0.002658311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00430624,0.0001797282,0.0002127313,0.0006583133,0.0006494233,0.0005239068,0.0006552493,0.0002294284,0.0001999397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003411192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001074827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003800271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004859333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996393,0.00009614425,0.0000200654,0.0001565906,0.00004838394,0.00003960009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971043,0.001529161,0.0006821961,0.0002175053,0.0003023955,0.0001644888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001613925,0.00002396812,0.9690331,0.00005834691,0.0001586309,0.00008056873,0.001004568,0.00328207,0.01086157,0.0007324063,0.0002339557,0.0143696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002236516,0.00001669115,0.9925469,0.000005118759,0.000009710936,0.00007762258,0.0003086304,0.005941912,0.0002166499,0.0007279831,0.0001390618,0.000007567387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972601,0.00006595089,0.001969517,0.00002399402,9.451172e-7,0.00000458736,0.0001837673,0.00001641915,0.0004746401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995136,0.0000103497,0.0003019654,0.000003692535,0.000001523413,0.000003042969,0.00009837387,0.000003005438,0.00006433876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003800271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008892953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008591506013472052,"score_gpt":0.2357888967583199,"score_spread":0.2271973907448478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}